Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS vs Lund 1760 Predator SC — Depreciation Comparison

Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS vs Lund 1760 Predator SC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1760 Predator SC. Over the first five years the Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS loses roughly $10,238 while the Lund 1760 Predator SC loses about $9,163 — a gap near $-1075.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS sheds about 24% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 1760 Predator SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…