Lund 1660 Predator vs Lund SSV 16: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1660 Predator holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1660 Predator comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Lund SSV 16. Over the first five years the Lund 1660 Predator loses roughly $8,797 while the Lund SSV 16 loses about $3,048 — a gap near $-5749.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1660 Predator sheds about 11% in year one versus 23% for the Lund SSV 16. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…