Lund 1675 Impact SS vs SeaArk 1860MV: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1675 Impact SS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1675 Impact SS comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the SeaArk 1860MV. Over the first five years the Lund 1675 Impact SS loses roughly $8,573 while the SeaArk 1860MV loses about $2,096 — a gap near $-6477.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1675 Impact SS sheds about 6% in year one versus 14% for the SeaArk 1860MV. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…