Lund 1800 Alaskan vs RH Aluminum 26 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL: 5-year value retention (74% vs 74%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1800 Alaskan holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1800 Alaskan comes out ahead, holding about 74% of its value versus 74% for the RH Aluminum 26 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL. Over the first five years the Lund 1800 Alaskan loses roughly $8,787 while the RH Aluminum 26 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL loses about $27,166 — a gap near $18,379.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1800 Alaskan sheds about 8% in year one versus 7% for the RH Aluminum 26 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…