Lund 1870 Predator SC vs SeaArk RXT170 CC: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1870 Predator SC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1870 Predator SC comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the SeaArk RXT170 CC. Over the first five years the Lund 1870 Predator SC loses roughly $8,428 while the SeaArk RXT170 CC loses about $3,269 — a gap near $-5159.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1870 Predator SC sheds about 24% in year one versus 8% for the SeaArk RXT170 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…