Dusky 278 CC vs Lund 2000 Alaskan SS — Depreciation Comparison

Dusky 278 CC vs Lund 2000 Alaskan SS: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Dusky 278 CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Dusky 278 CC comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS. Over the first five years the Dusky 278 CC loses roughly $17,556 while the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS loses about $12,919 — a gap near $-4637.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Dusky 278 CC sheds about 22% in year one versus 9% for the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…