Lund 2000 Alaskan vs Lund 219 Pro V GL: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 2000 Alaskan holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 2000 Alaskan comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Lund 219 Pro V GL. Over the first five years the Lund 2000 Alaskan loses roughly $11,785 while the Lund 219 Pro V GL loses about $39,881 — a gap near $28,096.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 2000 Alaskan sheds about 9% in year one versus 22% for the Lund 219 Pro V GL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…