Mako 334 CC vs Mirrocraft Northport F160SC O: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mako 334 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Mako 334 CC comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Mirrocraft Northport F160SC O. Over the first five years the Mako 334 CC loses roughly $104,944 while the Mirrocraft Northport F160SC O loses about $4,679 — a gap near $-100265.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mako 334 CC sheds about 8% in year one versus 22% for the Mirrocraft Northport F160SC O. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…