Mako Pro Skiff 17 CC vs May-Craft 2000 Cape Classic CC: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mako Pro Skiff 17 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Mako Pro Skiff 17 CC comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the May-Craft 2000 Cape Classic CC. Over the first five years the Mako Pro Skiff 17 CC loses roughly $9,183 while the May-Craft 2000 Cape Classic CC loses about $10,938 — a gap near $1,755.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mako Pro Skiff 17 CC sheds about 18% in year one versus 27% for the May-Craft 2000 Cape Classic CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…