Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 297QB vs Man Cave Rv FW30SS — Depreciation Comparison

Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 297QB vs Man Cave Rv FW30SS: 5-year value retention (52% vs 52%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 297QB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 297QB comes out ahead, holding about 52% of its value versus 52% for the Man Cave Rv FW30SS. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 297QB loses roughly $19,768 while the Man Cave Rv FW30SS loses about $34,445 — a gap near $14,677.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 297QB sheds about 15% in year one versus 34% for the Man Cave Rv FW30SS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…