Mirrocraft Northport F1685 vs Ranger 622FS Pro — Depreciation Comparison

Mirrocraft Northport F1685 vs Ranger 622FS Pro: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mirrocraft Northport F1685 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Mirrocraft Northport F1685 comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Ranger 622FS Pro. Over the first five years the Mirrocraft Northport F1685 loses roughly $2,856 while the Ranger 622FS Pro loses about $31,331 — a gap near $28,475.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mirrocraft Northport F1685 sheds about 4% in year one versus 16% for the Ranger 622FS Pro. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…