Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO vs Sea Born LX22 CC LT — Depreciation Comparison

Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO vs Sea Born LX22 CC LT: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Sea Born LX22 CC LT. Over the first five years the Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO loses roughly $5,789 while the Sea Born LX22 CC LT loses about $26,028 — a gap near $20,239.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO sheds about 20% in year one versus 28% for the Sea Born LX22 CC LT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…