Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC vs Mitzi Skiffs 17 Shallow Tunnel FO: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Shallow Tunnel FO. Over the first five years the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC loses roughly $3,961 while the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Shallow Tunnel FO loses about $6,348 — a gap near $2,387.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft MV 1860 AW SC sheds about 8% in year one versus 21% for the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Shallow Tunnel FO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…