Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO vs Nautic Star 2602 Legacy CC — Depreciation Comparison

Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO vs Nautic Star 2602 Legacy CC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Nautic Star 2602 Legacy CC. Over the first five years the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO loses roughly $5,372 while the Nautic Star 2602 Legacy CC loses about $49,319 — a gap near $43,947.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO sheds about 20% in year one versus 11% for the Nautic Star 2602 Legacy CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…