May-Craft 2300 CCX CC vs Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO — Depreciation Comparison

May-Craft 2300 CCX CC vs Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. May-Craft 2300 CCX CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the May-Craft 2300 CCX CC comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO. Over the first five years the May-Craft 2300 CCX CC loses roughly $17,169 while the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO loses about $7,707 — a gap near $-9462.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the May-Craft 2300 CCX CC sheds about 11% in year one versus 21% for the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…