Nash 24M vs Rockwood By Forest River 1940F — Depreciation Comparison

Nash 24M vs Rockwood By Forest River 1940F: 5-year value retention (59% vs 59%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Nash 24M holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Nash 24M comes out ahead, holding about 59% of its value versus 59% for the Rockwood By Forest River 1940F. Over the first five years the Nash 24M loses roughly $23,156 while the Rockwood By Forest River 1940F loses about $7,598 — a gap near $-15558.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Nash 24M sheds about 28% in year one versus 10% for the Rockwood By Forest River 1940F. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…