Arctic Fox 28F vs New Horizons 393S: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 28F holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 28F comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the New Horizons 393S. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 28F loses roughly $35,113 while the New Horizons 393S loses about $130,192 — a gap near $95,079.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 28F sheds about 29% in year one versus 31% for the New Horizons 393S. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…