Arctic Fox 35 5Z vs New Horizons 475S: 5-year value retention (54% vs 54%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 35 5Z holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 35 5Z comes out ahead, holding about 54% of its value versus 54% for the New Horizons 475S. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 35 5Z loses roughly $52,826 while the New Horizons 475S loses about $157,430 — a gap near $104,604.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 35 5Z sheds about 14% in year one versus 31% for the New Horizons 475S. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…