Playcraft 2100 vs Zodiac N ZO 680 NEO: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Playcraft 2100 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Playcraft 2100 comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Zodiac N ZO 680 NEO. Over the first five years the Playcraft 2100 loses roughly $27,538 while the Zodiac N ZO 680 NEO loses about $28,398 — a gap near $860.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Playcraft 2100 sheds about 30% in year one versus 6% for the Zodiac N ZO 680 NEO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…