Polar Kraft 179 WT vs SeaArk RXJT180 CC: 5-year value retention (81% vs 81%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polar Kraft 179 WT holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polar Kraft 179 WT comes out ahead, holding about 81% of its value versus 81% for the SeaArk RXJT180 CC. Over the first five years the Polar Kraft 179 WT loses roughly $4,691 while the SeaArk RXJT180 CC loses about $2,612 — a gap near $-2079.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polar Kraft 179 WT sheds about 4% in year one versus 6% for the SeaArk RXJT180 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…