Polar Kraft 189 WT vs Polar Kraft 2010 WT: 5-year value retention (81% vs 81%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polar Kraft 189 WT holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polar Kraft 189 WT comes out ahead, holding about 81% of its value versus 81% for the Polar Kraft 2010 WT. Over the first five years the Polar Kraft 189 WT loses roughly $5,135 while the Polar Kraft 2010 WT loses about $5,011 — a gap near $-124.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polar Kraft 189 WT sheds about 4% in year one versus 4% for the Polar Kraft 2010 WT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…