Polar Kraft 2010 CC vs SeaArk RXT180 CC: 5-year value retention (81% vs 81%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polar Kraft 2010 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polar Kraft 2010 CC comes out ahead, holding about 81% of its value versus 81% for the SeaArk RXT180 CC. Over the first five years the Polar Kraft 2010 CC loses roughly $4,662 while the SeaArk RXT180 CC loses about $2,577 — a gap near $-2085.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polar Kraft 2010 CC sheds about 4% in year one versus 6% for the SeaArk RXT180 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…