Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 LT vs Polaris 600 RMK 144: 5-year value retention (60% vs 60%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polaris 600 RMK 144 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polaris 600 RMK 144 comes out ahead, holding about 60% of its value versus 60% for the Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 LT. Over the first five years the Polaris 600 RMK 144 loses roughly $4,382 while the Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 LT loses about $2,981 — a gap near $-1401.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polaris 600 RMK 144 sheds about 8% in year one versus 8% for the Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 LT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…