Polaris Ranger XP 1000 EPS Camo vs Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Polaris Ranger XP 1000 EPS Camo. Over the first five years the Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS loses roughly $6,084 while the Polaris Ranger XP 1000 EPS Camo loses about $4,627 — a gap near $-1457.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS sheds about 5% in year one versus 5% for the Polaris Ranger XP 1000 EPS Camo. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…