Polaris Ranger XP Nrtstr ULT Camo vs Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polaris Ranger XP Nrtstr ULT Camo holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polaris Ranger XP Nrtstr ULT Camo comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS. Over the first five years the Polaris Ranger XP Nrtstr ULT Camo loses roughly $9,071 while the Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS loses about $6,084 — a gap near $-2987.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polaris Ranger XP Nrtstr ULT Camo sheds about 0% in year one versus 5% for the Polaris RZR XP 4 Turbo EPS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…