Alweld 1644 Mud vs Princecraft Starfish 16 WT: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1644 Mud holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1644 Mud comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Princecraft Starfish 16 WT. Over the first five years the Alweld 1644 Mud loses roughly $2,019 while the Princecraft Starfish 16 WT loses about $2,331 — a gap near $312.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1644 Mud sheds about 11% in year one versus 21% for the Princecraft Starfish 16 WT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…