Alumacraft Voyageur 175 Tiller vs Ranger 220F: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Voyageur 175 Tiller holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Voyageur 175 Tiller comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Ranger 220F. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Voyageur 175 Tiller loses roughly $4,041 while the Ranger 220F loses about $10,439 — a gap near $6,398.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Voyageur 175 Tiller sheds about 8% in year one versus 8% for the Ranger 220F. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…