Ranger 243C vs SeaArk BX 190 — Depreciation Comparison

Ranger 243C vs SeaArk BX 190: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ranger 243C holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ranger 243C comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the SeaArk BX 190. Over the first five years the Ranger 243C loses roughly $15,692 while the SeaArk BX 190 loses about $5,801 — a gap near $-9891.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ranger 243C sheds about 7% in year one versus 12% for the SeaArk BX 190. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…