Ranger MPV1652H vs SeaArk Fxjt 2072 CC — Depreciation Comparison

Ranger MPV1652H vs SeaArk Fxjt 2072 CC: 5-year value retention (80% vs 80%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ranger MPV1652H holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ranger MPV1652H comes out ahead, holding about 80% of its value versus 80% for the SeaArk Fxjt 2072 CC. Over the first five years the Ranger MPV1652H loses roughly $3,215 while the SeaArk Fxjt 2072 CC loses about $3,463 — a gap near $248.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ranger MPV1652H sheds about 4% in year one versus 6% for the SeaArk Fxjt 2072 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…