Ranger Z521L SC vs Tracker Pro 160 — Depreciation Comparison

Ranger Z521L SC vs Tracker Pro 160: 5-year value retention (84% vs 84%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ranger Z521L SC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ranger Z521L SC comes out ahead, holding about 84% of its value versus 84% for the Tracker Pro 160. Over the first five years the Ranger Z521L SC loses roughly $14,220 while the Tracker Pro 160 loses about $2,178 — a gap near $-12042.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ranger Z521L SC sheds about 5% in year one versus 3% for the Tracker Pro 160. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…