Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 367BHS vs Recreation By Design 139 — Depreciation Comparison

Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 367BHS vs Recreation By Design 139: 5-year value retention (50% vs 50%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 367BHS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 367BHS comes out ahead, holding about 50% of its value versus 50% for the Recreation By Design 139. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 367BHS loses roughly $54,211 while the Recreation By Design 139 loses about $53,202 — a gap near $-1009.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 367BHS sheds about 28% in year one versus 13% for the Recreation By Design 139. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…