Regal 33 SAV vs Schaefer 400 — Depreciation Comparison

Regal 33 SAV vs Schaefer 400: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Regal 33 SAV holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Regal 33 SAV comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Schaefer 400. Over the first five years the Regal 33 SAV loses roughly $194,280 while the Schaefer 400 loses about $212,586 — a gap near $18,306.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Regal 33 SAV sheds about 30% in year one versus 12% for the Schaefer 400. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…