Polar Kraft 165 SC vs RH Aluminum 19 Coastal: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polar Kraft 165 SC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polar Kraft 165 SC comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the RH Aluminum 19 Coastal. Over the first five years the Polar Kraft 165 SC loses roughly $4,067 while the RH Aluminum 19 Coastal loses about $9,363 — a gap near $5,296.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polar Kraft 165 SC sheds about 5% in year one versus 11% for the RH Aluminum 19 Coastal. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…