Robalo R222 EX CC vs Sea Fox 228 Commander CC — Depreciation Comparison

Robalo R222 EX CC vs Sea Fox 228 Commander CC: 5-year value retention (62% vs 62%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Robalo R222 EX CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Robalo R222 EX CC comes out ahead, holding about 62% of its value versus 62% for the Sea Fox 228 Commander CC. Over the first five years the Robalo R222 EX CC loses roughly $43,856 while the Sea Fox 228 Commander CC loses about $44,694 — a gap near $838.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Robalo R222 EX CC sheds about 30% in year one versus 29% for the Sea Fox 228 Commander CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…