Living Vehicle Core vs Salem By Forest River 353FLFB — Depreciation Comparison

Living Vehicle Core vs Salem By Forest River 353FLFB: 5-year value retention (55% vs 55%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Living Vehicle Core holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Living Vehicle Core comes out ahead, holding about 55% of its value versus 55% for the Salem By Forest River 353FLFB. Over the first five years the Living Vehicle Core loses roughly $262,481 while the Salem By Forest River 353FLFB loses about $27,603 — a gap near $-234878.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Living Vehicle Core sheds about 11% in year one versus 11% for the Salem By Forest River 353FLFB. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…