Salem By Forest River 378FL vs Shasta By Forest River 367BH — Depreciation Comparison

Salem By Forest River 378FL vs Shasta By Forest River 367BH: 5-year value retention (48% vs 48%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Salem By Forest River 378FL holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Salem By Forest River 378FL comes out ahead, holding about 48% of its value versus 48% for the Shasta By Forest River 367BH. Over the first five years the Salem By Forest River 378FL loses roughly $51,799 while the Shasta By Forest River 367BH loses about $50,194 — a gap near $-1605.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Salem By Forest River 378FL sheds about 27% in year one versus 32% for the Shasta By Forest River 367BH. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…