Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC vs Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg — Depreciation Comparison

Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC vs Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg. Over the first five years the Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC loses roughly $14,581 while the Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg loses about $32,669 — a gap near $18,088.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC sheds about 18% in year one versus 11% for the Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…