G3 1652VBW vs Scout 420 LXF CCC: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Scout 420 LXF CCC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Scout 420 LXF CCC comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the G3 1652VBW. Over the first five years the Scout 420 LXF CCC loses roughly $363,330 while the G3 1652VBW loses about $2,098 — a gap near $-361232.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Scout 420 LXF CCC sheds about 6% in year one versus 13% for the G3 1652VBW. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…