Crestliner XF 189 vs Sea Hunt Ultra 196 CC — Depreciation Comparison

Crestliner XF 189 vs Sea Hunt Ultra 196 CC: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crestliner XF 189 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Crestliner XF 189 comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the Sea Hunt Ultra 196 CC. Over the first five years the Crestliner XF 189 loses roughly $7,462 while the Sea Hunt Ultra 196 CC loses about $12,480 — a gap near $5,018.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crestliner XF 189 sheds about 11% in year one versus 5% for the Sea Hunt Ultra 196 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…