Sea Pro 228 vs Sea Pro 228 W Canvas Soft TOP — Depreciation Comparison

Sea Pro 228 vs Sea Pro 228 W Canvas Soft TOP: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Sea Pro 228 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Sea Pro 228 comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Sea Pro 228 W Canvas Soft TOP. Over the first five years the Sea Pro 228 loses roughly $25,521 while the Sea Pro 228 W Canvas Soft TOP loses about $28,323 — a gap near $2,802.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Sea Pro 228 sheds about 12% in year one versus 12% for the Sea Pro 228 W Canvas Soft TOP. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…