SeaArk 1652MV vs SeaArk 1660MVJT — Depreciation Comparison

SeaArk 1652MV vs SeaArk 1660MVJT: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk 1652MV holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the SeaArk 1652MV comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the SeaArk 1660MVJT. Over the first five years the SeaArk 1652MV loses roughly $2,054 while the SeaArk 1660MVJT loses about $2,488 — a gap near $434.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk 1652MV sheds about 15% in year one versus 15% for the SeaArk 1660MVJT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…