G3 1652WOF vs SeaArk 1652MVT — Depreciation Comparison

G3 1652WOF vs SeaArk 1652MVT: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 1652WOF holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the G3 1652WOF comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the SeaArk 1652MVT. Over the first five years the G3 1652WOF loses roughly $6,964 while the SeaArk 1652MVT loses about $2,134 — a gap near $-4830.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 1652WOF sheds about 11% in year one versus 15% for the SeaArk 1652MVT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…