Lund 208 Tyee GL vs SeaArk 1660 MVT Rescue — Depreciation Comparison

Lund 208 Tyee GL vs SeaArk 1660 MVT Rescue: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 208 Tyee GL holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lund 208 Tyee GL comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the SeaArk 1660 MVT Rescue. Over the first five years the Lund 208 Tyee GL loses roughly $21,990 while the SeaArk 1660 MVT Rescue loses about $2,732 — a gap near $-19258.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 208 Tyee GL sheds about 5% in year one versus 13% for the SeaArk 1660 MVT Rescue. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…