Lund 1675 Impact Sport vs SeaArk 2272MVJT: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1675 Impact Sport holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1675 Impact Sport comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the SeaArk 2272MVJT. Over the first five years the Lund 1675 Impact Sport loses roughly $9,082 while the SeaArk 2272MVJT loses about $3,211 — a gap near $-5871.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1675 Impact Sport sheds about 6% in year one versus 14% for the SeaArk 2272MVJT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…