Lund 189 Pro V GL vs SeaArk Mud Runner 180: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 189 Pro V GL holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 189 Pro V GL comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the SeaArk Mud Runner 180. Over the first five years the Lund 189 Pro V GL loses roughly $29,033 while the SeaArk Mud Runner 180 loses about $3,692 — a gap near $-25341.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 189 Pro V GL sheds about 24% in year one versus 16% for the SeaArk Mud Runner 180. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…