Alumacraft MV 1756 AW CC vs SeaArk Predator 200FS CC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk Predator 200FS CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the SeaArk Predator 200FS CC comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW CC. Over the first five years the SeaArk Predator 200FS CC loses roughly $12,653 while the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW CC loses about $3,580 — a gap near $-9073.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk Predator 200FS CC sheds about 8% in year one versus 8% for the Alumacraft MV 1756 AW CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…