SeaArk RXT160 SC vs Xtreme 1660 Flats — Depreciation Comparison

SeaArk RXT160 SC vs Xtreme 1660 Flats: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk RXT160 SC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the SeaArk RXT160 SC comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Xtreme 1660 Flats. Over the first five years the SeaArk RXT160 SC loses roughly $2,520 while the Xtreme 1660 Flats loses about $3,230 — a gap near $710.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk RXT160 SC sheds about 7% in year one versus 5% for the Xtreme 1660 Flats. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…