Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 260RD vs Shasta By Forest River 30RLS: 5-year value retention (47% vs 47%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 260RD holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 260RD comes out ahead, holding about 47% of its value versus 47% for the Shasta By Forest River 30RLS. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 260RD loses roughly $40,729 while the Shasta By Forest River 30RLS loses about $38,994 — a gap near $-1735.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 260RD sheds about 28% in year one versus 32% for the Shasta By Forest River 30RLS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…