Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM2 0ES vs Ski-Doo SMTX154850PMLFE2 5SHTTLAC — Depreciation Comparison

Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM2 0ES vs Ski-Doo SMTX154850PMLFE2 5SHTTLAC: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM2 0ES holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM2 0ES comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Ski-Doo SMTX154850PMLFE2 5SHTTLAC. Over the first five years the Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM2 0ES loses roughly $6,997 while the Ski-Doo SMTX154850PMLFE2 5SHTTLAC loses about $7,174 — a gap near $177.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM2 0ES sheds about 17% in year one versus 16% for the Ski-Doo SMTX154850PMLFE2 5SHTTLAC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…