Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM25SHOT vs Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBR IRXT1 5ES — Depreciation Comparison

Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM25SHOT vs Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBR IRXT1 5ES: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM25SHOT holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM25SHOT comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBR IRXT1 5ES. Over the first five years the Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM25SHOT loses roughly $7,157 while the Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBR IRXT1 5ES loses about $7,157 — a gap near $0.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ski-Doo BCKCNTRYXRS154850PM25SHOT sheds about 17% in year one versus 17% for the Ski-Doo RNGDX900ACETRBR IRXT1 5ES. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…